In her first year as a member of the
Australian Girls’ Choir my daughter learnt an environmental hymn, ‘For the
Children’. Through the words of this song we are challenged to preserve the
beauty and diversity of the creation for future generations. Salination,
polluted and silted waterways, growing problems with waste disposal and a
growing number of species on the endangered and threatened lists are current
realities. Although scientists are divided over the issue, there is a real
possibility that human activity is contributing to global warming.
In the book ‘Corporate Collapse’ Steven
Cohen and Damien Grace argue that increased regulation is not the answer to
unethical corporate behaviour. Fundamental to an organisation achieving high
ethical standards is a desire and commitment from the top to do so. Regulation
has a role. Sydney-siders have been warned for some time of dwindling water
supplies. Water restrictions with their accompanying threat of fines will
encourage some of us to become more frugal consumers. Real changes in the way
we care for our environment will only take place when we have a genuine desire
for and commitment to its care.
We all know things we can do to be more
environmentally responsible. Unfortunately it is sometimes cheaper and more
convenient to do otherwise. Green power and green bags cost more – and you have
to remember to take the bags. The car is often quicker and more convenient than
public transport. While all of us can and should make an effort to reduce our
environmental impact our response will be determined to some extent by our
economic and other circumstances. There is one thing we can all do that would
have a significant impact.
Neil Nedley’s book “Proof Positive: How
to Reliably Combat Disease and Achieve Optimal Health through Nutrition and
Lifestyle” contains the following data – converted from Imperial to Metric. It
takes 4.8 kg of feed to produce 1 kg of beef. Every kilogram of beef requires
3564 litres of water, compared to 574 litres for a kilogram of wheat. If the
total world population consumed meat at a similar rate to that in America or
Australia world grain production would need to increase by 150% over current
production for all purposes. Livestock produce between 15-20% of the world’s
total methane production – one of the three major green house gases. Livestock
production is linked to deforestation and the loss of habitat, soil erosion,
river siltation and pollution. A marked reduction in meat consumption would
have significant environmental benefits and result in improved health outcomes
simultaneously.
My daughter enjoys visiting the zoo. As I
walk around the enclosures I am saddened to see the number of animals whose
survival is threatened. What legacy are we leaving our children and our
children’s children? Will they thank us if the only experience they have of
pandas, tigers and koalas is in a virtual reality zoo? The choices we make
today will determine the legacy we leave future generations.
(September
2003)
No comments:
Post a Comment